Quick Reply
Search this Thread
And I'd hate to fade alone
retired moderator
#951 Old 31st Jul 2025 at 4:06 PM
Quote: Originally posted by simmer22
The laptop is probably running on fumes (it's around 5 years old, how time flies ) but I'm hoping it's not on its last leg yet...

My sims computer was built in 2012, it's had some new hard drives but that's about it! It's a legend in my house.
Mad Poster
#952 Old 31st Jul 2025 at 6:39 PM Last edited by simmer22 : 3rd Aug 2025 at 8:48 PM.
Quote: Originally posted by simsample
My sims computer was built in 2012, it's had some new hard drives but that's about it! It's a legend in my house.


My laptops have mostly reached around 5-7 years old, and the desktop one did started failing after around 8-ish years, but they've all been heavily used and travelled with (even the desktop one, which had to endure some rounds - quite well packed, as I kept the original box and all for that purpose. The screen cables got the worst of it, so I always had to adjust away the ghost images )

EDIT: Seems the issue I had with the laptop was fixable, and it also got a cleaning job while they were at it, so hopefully it lasts for a bit longer . It had its first trip outside the house in a somewhat improvised backpack setup (can't find a cover for the thing, too big) and the weather was kinda iffy, so I was just hoping it wouldn't rain (just a few drops, nothing got wet).

EDIT again:
Wasps! Was making dinner and noticed something tickling my arm. Swatted it away, thinking it was a fly. Then mom yells, "Wasp!" and I panic, and run out of the room (I have this thing with small flying critters that potentially can sting... Actually, most small flying critters, really :/) - anyway, we try to use a vacuum cleaner to get at the thing. Suddenly it's gone. We peek in. The stupid buzz-ball has drowned itself in the frying pan (yuck!) . We fish it (and some surrounding stuff) out, and carry on with the dinner. Suddenly I see a streak of black from the corner of my eye, again thinking "fly", but this time being a bit more cautious. Again, it turns out to be a friggin' wasp. It meets its end in the vaccuum cleaner (one wasp in the dinner is enough, and the window gets closed immediately, because our dinner is clearly smelling better than flowers outside . About 15 minutes later we take a walk, and - I'm not even joking - another wasp decides to try and ruin our evening (but at least it flies away after buzzing around for a bit). I swear, if I never see a wasp again, it's too soon
Mad Poster
Original Poster
#953 Old 5th Aug 2025 at 5:04 PM
The whole Internet censorship thing is starting to get out of hand. Especially on YouTube.

I have ended up developing a truly distasteful foul mouth from this morning's discovery of people saying "the Internet as we know it is going to die..."

The whole thing of using "think of the children" is just another way people can impose oppression by using children as a figurative shield, a scapegoat...I find it to be an exploitative move.

Unfortunately, I am pretty angry 😤 especially since I have had my fair share of mishaps when it involved a bank card. I would never give it such information.

Especially after that time the LifeLock guy posted his Social Security number on a bill board to prove he was safe. (He wasn't)


Personal Quote: "I like my men like my sodas: tall boys." (Zevia has both 12 and 16 oz options)

(P.S. I'm about 5' (150cm) in height and easily scared)
Mad Poster
#954 Old 5th Aug 2025 at 6:49 PM Last edited by simmer22 : 5th Aug 2025 at 11:04 PM.
Censorship is 99,9% made up by people who want to control other people's lives, and not people who want to "protect the children". It's just an excuse for their own end goals. Most of the time they haven't read/seen/understood the media or literature they want to ban, they just do it because it touches a subject they find difficult, regardless of whether it's a "good" or "bad" piece of media, or a factual school book, or a perfectly innocent children's book that slightly touches on a theme they find "difficult".

There are however one or two pieces of literature that could need some heavy censorship, because they've caused a LOT of trouble over a looong stretch of time, and doing so probably would solve quite a lot of other issues too. There likely wouldn't be much left of them, which in my opinion would probably be for the best .

As for what people post on the internet - some people should probably post less, in regards to their own safety.

---

Anyway - had some stuff left over that needed to be used up, so made waffles (yummy!)

Been cleaning/tidying some old stuff, so feels like I'm half covered in dust...
Mad Poster
Original Poster
#955 Old 5th Aug 2025 at 9:23 PM
Agreed on the issue of censorship. Usually the control is out of people trying to control those who have no influence.

The mentioning of the card, was due to YouTube saying, once enacted, they'll ask for your personal information of a photo ID, credit card or selfie if they suspect you aren't "acting your age" in terms of what you search, which will do more harm than good as they are using a 3rd party firm and an AI (I have my doubts with the AI). That alone could involve an identity theft issue for those who comply.

But I guess I am curious now about those waffles. I have been really hungry about that. Actually, I don't eat waffles as much.

I just woke up and I am kinda hungry.

Personal Quote: "I like my men like my sodas: tall boys." (Zevia has both 12 and 16 oz options)

(P.S. I'm about 5' (150cm) in height and easily scared)
Mad Poster
#956 Old 5th Aug 2025 at 11:26 PM
The ID issue, yeah. I don't think it applies to where I live, but it does sound like an identity theft risk waiting to happen.

The waffles were made with lots of eggs and more oat flour than wheat, plus I didn't put any regular sugar in them (just a couple teaspoons of vanilla-infused sugar - it's more for the vanilla taste), so they're at least kinda healthier than plain waffles.
I have this thing with waffles and pancakes where I generally don't bother with recipes because the batter is usually very forgiving, especially for waffles, I just make something that seems like it will work, test it out, and adjust if something isn't right. I've experimented with putting various stuff in the batter, too - grated apples or carrots, bananas, coconut flour instead of regular flour, leftover vanilla custard, sour cream, cinnamon, other spices, cheese, probably other things as well - not everything at once, though. Either sweet, plain or savory - and in most cases they turn out pretty decent. Plus, it's a super way to use up leftover eggs or milk products (milk, cream, sour cream, etc.). They can easily be a healthy "cheat" breakfast if you put a lot of healthy stuff in them.
Theorist
#957 Old 6th Aug 2025 at 11:03 AM Last edited by Gargoyle Cat : 6th Aug 2025 at 1:15 PM. Reason: typo
I'm going to play devils advocate with this whole censorship thing. I would never hand over a credit card or my ID just to access something on the internet and would never advise anybody else to do so.

That being said, this has been a topic in the video game industry. Most people didn't blink a eye to the idea. Upon doing a quick search, there are weirdos on Reddit that are celebrating it. I wonder what their intentions are.

Quote:
ESRB proposes facial recognition as new form of age verification ESRB proposes facial recognition as new form of age verification


The ESRB has issued a new proposal to the FTC calling for the approval of facial recognition. The video game ratings body believes the technology can better help verify that anyone attempting to buy a mature-rated game is a legal adult.

Known as the Privacy-Protective Facial Age Estimation (and first spotted by GamesIndustry), the proposal is made in collaboration with the digital identity firm Yoti and Epic Games subsidiary SuperAwesome.

Though the ESRB has made an effort to outline a game's content on physical boxes, age verification to buy digital games is incredibly easy to bypass: all one has to do is put in a birthdate older than 18 years, often without any real follow up.

In its proposal, the ESRB said the Age Estimation "offers parents an easy way to provide VPC through a quick process, without needing to provide extensive personal information, in line with data minimization principles." It also noted that this verification method would be especially useful for guardians without government ID.

To buy a game, a user would have to take a picture of their face right at that moment to submit for verification. Photos that don't meet the required quality will be rejected, while accepted photos are submitted to Yoti's backend for age estimation. After the verification, the photo is said to be "immediately, permanently deleted."


https://www.gamedeveloper.com/busin...ge-verification

Andrew Wilson ( CEO of EA) has talked about this. Not much of a surprise since he's on the board of the ESRB. Also not a surprise that TS4 keeps getting a pass from companies such as Visa and Mastercard ( they are denying sales of games they don't like. A whole other issue...) even though TS4 has incest and pedophilia in it. Granted, if a young child was playing the game, they wouldn't know what was happening, but regardless. It is there, Maxis knows it is there and they're okay with it being there.

Does anybody really believe that these companies are going to delete photos? I've got a bridge for sale if they do. Roblox is known for being a site for pedos to hang out on. Do people really want their kid's pictures on a site that has the reputation for that?

My point: I find it interesting how the masses are okay using ID for video games, but when it comes to gooner content, it's "Get your hands off my content!"

For those that want to circle the credit cards vs Valve rabbithole: https://techcrunch.com/2025/08/03/m...ifferent-story/
Mad Poster
#958 Old 6th Aug 2025 at 2:27 PM Last edited by simmer22 : 6th Aug 2025 at 5:51 PM.
I wouldn't even want my own picture on any of those sites, certainly not pictures of anyone's kids, even if it's just the face. Delete the pictures? I doubt it. They probably keep them around for at least 10 years, for "reasons". Feels like there are other more nefarious things going on behind the scenes...

Face ID belongs on things like passports and driver's licences, maybe on phones (although as far as I've gathered it only works in optiomal lighting conditions, and not for everyone if you've got darker skin or a very young-looking face, or anything else the face ID has issues reading because it's been poorly trained on one-note stock images), and not as "not particularly secure buy passes (AKA AI stock image training for potentially nefarious purposes)" for video games.

"Oh, but we are *cough* collecting all the precccciousss data, collecting yesss, and maybe usssing and ssselling data, and sssends targeted adsss *cough* I mean, protecting the children, that's it! Protecting the children! Yep. Just doing that. Nothing else. Pinky promise!"
Page 39 of 39
Back to top